
|
|
| Cultivar | Class1 | Fusarium Rating2 | Years (fusarium Data) | Test Weight | Thousand Kernel Weight | Height | Heading4 | Maturity4 | Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus | Straw Yield Index |
| MS | 9 | 77.0 | 36.0 | 90 | 52 | 96 | 1.0 | 85 | ||
| HS | 8 | 76.4 | 37.7 | 79 | 54 | 99 | 1.3 | 95 | ||
| S | 7 | 75.5 | 38.4 | 94 | 54 | 96 | 1.8 | 85 | ||
| MS | 6 | 76.6 | 38.0 | 104 | 52 | 96 | 1.3 | 100 | ||
| S | 5 | 77.2 | 35.5 | 87 | 52 | 96 | 3.8 | 93 | ||
| HS | 5 | 75.4 | 41.0 | 86 | 55 | 98 | 1.5 | 118 | ||
| S | 5 | 76.1 | 34.8 | 76 | 54 | 98 | 1.0 | 81 | ||
| MS | 5 | 76.6 | 42.8 | 98 | 54 | 97 | 1.0 | 99 | ||
| MR | 4 | 75.5 | 37.6 | 100 | 59 | 99 | 0.8 | 124 | ||
| MR | 4 | 75.3 | 37.4 | 101 | 60 | 99 | 1.3 | 129 | ||
| MS | 3 | 74.7 | 39.6 | 100 | 56 | 97 | 1.3 | 112 | ||
| MS | 4 | 75.9 | 37.9 | 94 | 51 | 96 | 1.3 | 86 | ||
| MS | 4 | 78.6 | 35.0 | 87 | 51 | 96 | 1.0 | 89 | ||
| S | 3 | 73.1 | 34.9 | 81 | 54 | 97 | 1.3 | 104 | ||
| MS | 3 | 77.2 | 42.4 | 104 | 57 | 98 | 1.3 | 120 | ||
| MS | 2 | 76.8 | 35.9 | 96 | 53 | 96 | 1.5 | 99 | ||
| MR | 2 | 78.1 | 36.2 | 80 | 54 | 96 | 1.0 | 98 | ||
| S | 2 | 76.1 | 38.9 | 96 | 54 | 96 | 1.5 | 88 | ||
| HS | 4 | 74.8 | 42.0 | 87 | 52 | 96 | 1.3 | 85 | ||
| S | 4 | 76.2 | 46.1 | 105 | 56 | 97 | 2.0 | 107 | ||
| S | 2 | 74.2 | 35.6 | 81 | 53 | 98 | 1.3 | 101 | ||
| Means | 76.0 | 38.3 | 92 | 54 | 97 | 1.4 | 5.37 | |||
| Locations | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | |||
1 HRS = hard red spring, EFS = eastern feed spring, a = awned.
2 Fusarium ratings are based on Fusarium head blight ratings and deoxynivalenol (DON) levels from inoculated provincial trials.
MR=moderately resistant (best); MS=moderately susceptible; S=susceptible; HS=highly susceptible (worst)
** These columns will be updated when the 2011 data are available.
3 For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable.
4 Days from planting. Heading and Physiological Maturity vary from year to year and should only be
used to indicate relative differences.